Re-Branding, Part 3

The final installment of re-branding cautions and corrections.

11. Putting the wrong person in charge: Now, I’m assuming that you’ve hired capable-to-outstanding branding consultants (or dedicated completely capable internal resources to this project), the quality of work delivered depends on sound, knowledgeable project management.  Plus, it takes UNEMOTIONAL detachment to properly assess your company.  Make sure your internal point person has the skills, time and resources to drive the agency to its most effective work.

12. Strategy by committee: I’ve already reference this before.  Too many opinions not only delay the re-branding process, they also diffuse the focus needed to achieve ROI.  Keep those with critical approval to an efficient shortlist (ideally, don’t even include them until close to the end of the process), and assemble the smallest, most essential project team possible.  The key is to include a real mix of all levels of the company… not just executive.  You want your brand ambassadors to weigh in, but not weigh the process down.

13.  Re-branding without research: There’s a lot of lip service about customers/customer satisfaction/customer service/customer-centric operations/etc., but in brand strategy sessions they’re often forgotten.  Current customers and desired customers should be front and center when creating new brand messages and images.  After all, the customer will be your ultimate success test.  That’s why I’m asking for your feedback NOW while I’m in the middle of moving through this process.  Who do YOU think Wendistry is?  Let me know…  much appreciation!!!

14.  Basing a re-brand on advertising: An ad campaign and a slogan do not equal brand positioning. Brand strategy should lead advertising… not the other way around.  In fact, with the rise of social media platforms and strategies, sometimes the most effective re-brands don’t include traditional advertising at all.

15.   Tunnel focus: Focusing exclusively on your own industry and market category can be limiting.  When re-branding, try cross-pollinating your thinking and consider what leaders in other industries are doing in regard to customer experience.  Consider Alan M. Webber’s Rule #24:  If you want to change the game, change the economics of how the game is played. Mr. Webber was co-founder of Fast Company magazine and former editorial director of the Harvard Business Review so you want to listen to him.

BONUS: Believing you’re too small to re-brand: Again, every brand needs refreshing to stay relevant as markets evolve.  Smaller companies and non-profits are not immune from this requirement… nor is Wendistry, and I’m very aware that I am extremely overdue.  Like larger brands, if you’re in business, you have a brand position that needs to be enhanced, refined and renewed.  Define your brand or you’ll be defined… and, chances are, you won’t like what you get back.

0
DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookNews VineRedditLinkedIn

Re-Branding, Part 2

Re-branding mistakes to avoid continued.

6.  The re-brand lacks credibility or is a superficial facelift: The re-brand’s story must be believable given the existing brand experience and customer perception.  So, don’t be afraid to push the envelope.  However, it must also hold credibility internally with you, your employees, and your partners.  If employees who live the brand day-to-day don’t believe the new story, your target audience won’t either.

7.  Limiting the influence of branding partners: Good branding consultants are more than graphic designers and image strategists.  The best ones help develop messaging and platforms that launch new products, expand demographic focuses and even streamline business operations.  Rein them in when it’s necessary, but don’t limit their areas of influence, either.

8.  Believing that re-branding costs too much: In either time or money, good thinking doesn’t have to come with a multi-million dollar price tag.  You can get access to amazing thinking and solid strategy from small and talented branding agencies, consultants and in-house talent.  Especially if your brand targets the younger age groups, consider university students or tap into the experience and wisdom of retired professionals for cost-effective and accurate results.

9.  Bypassing the basics: The value of perfecting your physical environment, marketing materials, web site, etc. is drastically decreased if your customers languish in line for inordinate amounts of time while your employees take their smoke breaks.  Or, if your invoices and contracts are written in 7-point legal jargon.  Or, if someone has to hit “3″… then “7″… then “6″… then “2″… on and on before they finally get to talk to a person.  Keep all customer touchpoints in mind when you are re-branding your company.

10.  Forgetting that people don’t do what they say… They do what they do: Use extreme caution when basing your re-branding strategies on focus group-type research.  Unless you’re physically in the customer’s environment observing them using your product or service, you’re not getting the full (and sometimes real) story.  Actual observation, while not perfect, will get you so much closer to the right brand.

0
DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookNews VineRedditLinkedIn

Re-Branding

Here at Wendistry, I’ve grown tired.  It’s more than Dallas Summer Heat exhaustion.  I’m tired of myself… over it all.  I want to start anew.  A new look; a chic image; a fresh brand.

Having just celebrated a milestone birthday, I no longer feel the need try and prove to others that I am qualified to know and execute good marketing.  I have the 20 years experience, scars, and moxie.  I have created and I build beautiful businesses and brands.  Because I’m launching two more companies this Fall 2009 outside of CityCrush Media, I want Wendistry to represent the overarching identity of ME behind all of them.

Smart marketers evolve their brands over time to keep them relevant and appropriate.  Some do it well, while others become the target of cynical bloggers and commentators.

Essentially, I’m in the process of the Re-Brand… which is torturous for me because I’ve never had any patience and I want the perfect words that describe me, the oh-so-stunning images that represent me, and the witty/intelligent/creative/aesthetic/cosmopolitan/striking/sumptuous/powerful content that conveys exactly who I am in a nanosecond glance.  Yea… not a lot to ask, eh?

So, while I know what to do and I know it takes time, I also (thankfully) know what activities to avoid.  Listing a few of them here, I’ll continue this thought process on for the rest of this week.

  1. Clinging to history: Rebranding is change, but it also means staying relevant.  Assumptions made when the brand was initially established may no longer hold true.  Wendistry in it’s original form was established in 1990… almost 20 years ago.  It was under a different name and had a different mission, but provided the same marketing, business building, media and promotions management consulting services that Wendistry provides now.  Today, I want to analyze the changes in my target markets (and in me) when I’m exploring opportunities for brand expansion, repositioning and revitalization.
  2. Thinking the brand is the logo, stationery, or corporate colors: Brands encompass EVERYTHING about your company (and YOU if you’re the owner)… from customer perception and experience to quality, look and feel, customer care, retail and web environments, the tone and voice of communications, and more.  In fact, I have argued that customer perception IS your brand… no matter what you think it is (another reason why I’m re-branding Wendistry).
  3. Navigating without a plan: Effective brands rely on a creative brief (this is the patience-testing process I’m working through right now) to keep everyone focused as the project progresses.  I’m including sections for a Situation Analysis (how does the brand act when???), Objectives (what is the new purpose and message?), Target Markets (who do I want to reach?  what are they interested in?), Budget and Resources, Time-frame, Point Person, Known Parameters, Approval Structure, Stakeholders and Metrics for assessing results.
  4. Not leveraging existing brand equity and goodwill: Dismissing brand equity when re-branding alienates established customers, while unnecessary overhauls can irreparably damage a brand’s perception.  Consider the needs and mindset of your target market carefully before digging into this process.  Sometimes a small evolution- or a new coat of paint- is all you need to rejuvenate and make a brand relevant.  Believe me, I have been torn back and forth on this one for the past 3 months… move to where I want to be or stay with what’s there and comfortable?  I know it isn’t easy, but I also know that anything that scares me, THAT’S what I need to do.
  5. Not trying on your customers’ shoes: Simply calling your own 800-number or receptionist may reveal a few of the challenges your customers face and may drive a couple of re-branding strategies, but, better yet, ask your friends, family and best customers to do the same and see what you learn.  Have your 70-year-old aunt navigate your web site, buy a product and try to return it.  Experience the other side of the fence for a while and see what you can do to REALLY upgrade your re-branding efforts.
0
DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookNews VineRedditLinkedIn

What Your Favorite Social Net Says About You

Today 110 million Americans, or 60% of the online population, use social networks, and that number is fairly conservative, according to a new study by Anderson Analytics.  It’s conservative because instead of counting unique users or everyone who has an account, as many estimates do, the Anderson study counted only people who have used a social network at least once in the past month.

Users tend to spend a lot of time on social networks.  The average social networker goes to social sites five days a week and checks in about four times a day for a total of an hour each day.  A super-connected 9% stay logged in all day and are “constantly checking out what’s new.”

Social networkers’ feelings about brands online in general are more positive than the researchers thought they would be.  Some 52% of social networkers had friended or become a fan of at least one brand.  When asked if seeing a brand on a social network makes them feel positive or negative about that brand, an almost-equal 17% said positive and 19% said negative.  The other 64% were neutral or didn’t care… a sign that most recognize that this is just another inevitable “marketing platform” for companies.

With the help of Tom Anderson, founder and managing partner at Anderson Analytics, Ad Age dug into the reams of  stats to create the mini profiles of four different social-networking groups below.

FACEBOOKERS:  40% married / 80% white / 6% retired.    There are 77 million Facebook users, according to the study, and Facebook users were almost completely average in their level of interest in most areas when compared with users of Twitter, MySpace and LinkedIn.  Out of 45 categories, only national news, sports, exercise, travel, and home and garden skewed even slightly higher than average, and then only by one or two percentage points.  Facebookers have the second-highest average income, at $61,000, and an average of 121 connections.  Facebook users also skew a bit older and are more likely to be late adopters of social media.  They are extremely loyal:  75% say Facebook is their favorite site, and another 59% say they have increased their site usage in the past 6 months.

TWITTERERS:  31% buy coffee online / 16% work part-time / 43% could live without it.    This is the super-user groupTwitterers are ore interested than the others in many subjects but skew particularly high in all news categories, restaurants, sports, politics, personal finance and religion.  They also especially like pop culture, with music, movies, TV and reading ranking higher than average.  And, their buying habits mirror that… they’re more likely to buy books, movies, shoes and cosmetics online than the other groups.  Twitterers are also entrepreneurial.  They are more likely than others to use  the service to promote their blogs or businesses.  With an average income of $58,000 and an anverage of 28 followers and 32 other Twitterers they are following, most Twitterers aren’t particularly attached to the site with 43% saying they could live without it.  (This factoid is rathering surprising to us here at Wendistry!)

MYSPACERS:  60% single / 23% students.    They are the young, the fun and the fleeing.  While MySpace users skew much younger, they also said they’d used the site much less in the past six months.  The 67 million who are still there are into having a good time.  They’re more likely to have joined my MySpace for fun and more likely to be interested in entertaining friends, humor and comedy, and video games.  They’re less into exercise than any other social group but seek out parenting information more than any other (huh???? this factoid is kinda disturbing to Wendistry!) MySpacers’ average income is the lowest at $44,000, and they have an average of 131 connections.  MySpace users are most likely to be black (9%) or Hispanic (7%) than users of the other social sites.

LINKEDINS:  57% male / 12% seek info on gambling.    It’s probably no surprise these guys (and most are guys) are all about business.  LinkedIns have the highest average income at $89,000, and are more likely to have joined the site for business or work.  Citing keeping in touch with business networks, job searching, business development and recruiting as the top reasons for signing up, LinkedIns interests reflect the fact that they like all kinds of news, employment information, sports and politics.  They also are more likely to be into the gym, spas, yoga, golf and tennis.  Excluding video game systems, LinkedIns own more electronic gadgets than the other social networkers, including digital cameras, high-definition TVs, DVRs and Blu-ray players.  Two surprising things they’re more interestd in than the others:  gambling and soap operas.  (needing some more drama in their lives, perhaps?)

Excerpts taken from Beth Snyder Bulik’s article in July 13, 2009 issue of Advertising Age.

0
DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookNews VineRedditLinkedIn

Your Brand, Your Spokesperson and Billy Mays

The rash of endorser deaths recently may have marked the end of an advertising era… the age of the spokesperson.

  • Michael Jackson:  Pepsi
  • Ed McMahon:  Publishers Clearing House
  • Karl Malden:  American Express’s “Don’t Leave Home Without It”
  • Farrah Fawcett:  Schick Speed Styler (for those 70′s wings)
  • Billy Mays:  OxiClean, Mighty Putty, Hercules Hook, etc.

During the days when it was possible to sell 30 million copies of “Thriller” and 12 million copies of a pinup poster, these celebrity endorsers parlayed their popularity into selling products to massive audiences that only the Super Bowl and (maybe) the Oscars can generate today.

Now, our media markets are fragmented across hundreds of channels and Mr. Mays didn’t use mass-media or fame to sell products, but rather became famous by selling products to thousands of niche cable audiences over the course of a decade.  So much so that the question has become:

Will the next Billy Mays please stand up?  Mr. Mays turned out to be incredibly indispensible, but someone will have to replace him.  Options include:

  • Billy Mays:  i.e. his father, Billy Mays, Sr., and his son, Billy Mays III, both of who also appeared in the Discover Channel show “Pitchmen.”
  • Anthony Sullivan:  Mr. Mays’ longtime friend, DRTV producer and co-star on Discovery’s “Pitchmen,” but even Mr. Sullivan has conceded that he’s no Billy Mays.
  • Vince Offer (a.k.a. Shlomi):  Mr. Offer’s breakthrough success with the ShamWow last year invited comparisons to Mr. Mays.  But, the man who uttered the memorable selling line “You’re gonna love my nuts” in his subsequent Slap Chop ad has a somewhat checkered past (and present… Miami Beach prostitute biting incident, anyone?).
  • Pitchman TBD:  The next Billy Mays is most probably out there right now pitching kitchen gadgets at Costco, purse accessories at the flea market, and/or vacuums at the home show near you.  All of the above came from that type of background, which eventually translated to the small screen.

When you go to assign a person/personality to represent your brand, make sure their personality, appearance, and behaviors align with your company goals.

0
DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookNews VineRedditLinkedIn

Attention ALL Companies: Angering Your Customers is Dangerous Business

I read an article this past weekend in Advertising Age, by Bob Garfield (see below) and I want to comment on the Stoneleigh Hotel in Dallas because I’m highlighting two companies who somehow think that they are above their customers.

First, the Stoneleigh… Now, I want to be clear.  I want, want, WANT to LOVE the Stoneleigh Hotel.  I met my boyfriend there for the first time over five years ago at a professional networking event.  I was so excited when they announced their remodel and upgrades two years ago and completed them all above anyone’s expectations.  I have been (and taken boyfriend) to the Spa in the Stoneleigh numerous times, and their services are sublime.  I love sipping cocktails in the lobby lounge and the retro chandeliers are chic.  I wish more than anything that they would get back to work on the Stoneleigh Residences Tower because I want to live here… do you get that I like this place?

So, I set a meeting in their lobby during a mid-afternoon this past week and after doing business, I noticed a flyer on the concierge desk in the lobby with all kinds of Spa promotional items.  With my iPhone in hand, I fired up TwitterFon Pro and commenced to tweeting one of their specials from my CityCrush (@CCDallas) account.  NOTE:  We have over 680 followers vs. the Stoneleigh’s 55.  In mid-Tweet, I realized that I wasn’t positive that the Stoneleigh’s Twitter ID was @StoneleighHotel (it is!).  I asked both the bartenders for confirmation, and they said they didn’t know it.

HUH?  Isn’t this basic marketing?  NOTE to all companies:  Every employee should know the company Twitter ID, Facebook group, LinkedIn URL.  It should be on their business cards for easy reference.

So, back at the Stoneleigh, I walk over to the Concierge Desk thinking (stupidly, it turns out, on my part) surely this guy will know.  Instead, I am handed a snippily delivered, “I don’t tweet.” complete with a side order of disdain.

Hello, Marketing Director at the Stoneleigh Hotel?  Maybe this is one reason why your job is so hard?  Your own freakin’ employees are in essence working against you.  I would call an all staff meeting asap and teach everyone two things:  1. basic manners  2.  know all the Stoneleigh’s brand messaging platforms

I would have thought that companies would know by now that you can’t ignore your customers… especially when you’ve angered them by bad, or rude, service.  I mean, we’ve stood here… given you our hard earned money… we WANT to like you… we WANT to feel great about the brands we do business with.  We want to be advocates and brand champions for you and make life easier on your entire Marketing Department.  Why do you continue to allow bad employees be bad brand representation?  You DO pay dearly for it, and the next paragraph is proof.

Music Video Forces United to Clean Up Customer-Service Act” by Bob Garfield in Advertising Age, June 13, 2009 issue.  So far, the YouTube video is approaching 3.5 MILLION views.  Way to go, Sons of Maxwell.

0
DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookNews VineRedditLinkedIn

The Hunter, The Farmer, and The Fisherman

More than just occupational differences, people who identify with these personalities are naturally suited for different authority positions.  The distinct styles of management, their impact on people, and the way in which people work together creates unique results for a company.

The Hunter is the stereotypical aggressive sales rep who is best at bringing in new clients and/or creating a new business.  The Farmer is perceived as being laid back when it comes to developing new clients, makes a good manager (not entrepreneur), but does a great job of cultivating relationships and new business with current clients.

HUNTER attributes include:  “bag the big game,” take charge, vision, aggressive, prospector, competitive, “Always Be Closing,” pitcher, Entrepreneurial Individualistic   FARMER characteristics are:  “cultivate the relationship,” let things develop, reality, laid back, planner, collaborative, “So, what do you think?” catcher, Team Player

So, which is better?  Or, a more accurate question would be is there a “better?”  Most successful business owners are neither Hunters or Farmers… they’re FISHERMAN.  The Fisherman is a model of both patience and well-timed aggressiveness that you need to land new clients and customers.  The Fisherman also has the wisdom and respect to cultivate the “fishing beds” so as to always have a source of food (a.k.a. revenues).

Fishing requires some solid planning about where to go to find the fish, research about what the fish like to eat, and what lures might attract them to nibble.  It requires patience while fish are nibbling and aggressiveness when its time to reel it in.  It also takes the courage to throw some fish back in when it’s not right for either you or the fish.

0
DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookNews VineRedditLinkedIn

Cold Stone Creamery

You come to a Cold Stone Creamery ice cream shop for the first time, not because you’ve seen any advertising, but because you’ve heard by word of mouth.  When you walk in, you walk right into a Brand Experience.  You see unexpected, appealing product differences all around that are thematically consistent and uniquely “Cold Stone.”

On top of the quality benchmarks for any ice cream store (clean, bright surroundings, ice cream on display, colorful promotional pieces, and friendly staff behind the counter), there are some Cold Stone bonuses:  only a few base flavors are displayed next to countless mix-ins… some predictable like crushed Heath Bars, chopped Reeses’s Peanut Butter cups,fruits, nuts, and sprinkles.  Some are completely unexpected like apple pie pieces and cheesecake crusts.

Right away it’s different.  As you get close to the counter, you see the big frozen stone where all the mixing is done.  So, instead of being bored in line, you get to watch all the outrageous flavors created fresh by skilled employees for the folks in front of you, and you get to see if theirs is better than yours or really yucky.

The decor is full of whacky flavor suggestions and ice cream photos.  The staff refer to themselves as Ice Cream Consultants.  There is no walking out of Cold Stone without perceiving a wonderful, unique brand experience that you or anyone else can articulate enthusiastically to the uninitiated whom you’ll inevitably tell, “What, you’ve never been to Cold Stone?  It’s this ice cream place where they mix any flavor of ice cream you want on a frozen counter, right in front of you.”

Custom crafted creamy goodness.  It’s product and performance rolled into one.  Yummers!

0
DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookNews VineRedditLinkedIn

It’s Like Breathing…

Managing the online life of your brand is like breathing oxygen; you do it continuously or you won’t survive.  Historically, brands were built through TV and print ads.  Today, Web 2.0 is the bedrock on which products, image and differentiation are created.  Without a strategy that incorporates the live Web as fundamental to branding, and that requires monitoring and managing your brand’s manifestation across the Internet, companies will find it impossible to influence the purchase decision or persuade audiences to participate in their ecosystem.

The rules for marketing products and communicating with target audiences have chanced.  Anyone can research your company and products, and more than reading negative customer comments, they can find out if you’re doing harm to the environment, using child labor in a foreign country, or providing poor customer service.  Online is where brand perceptions and reality collide, and companies need to be prepared for the fallout.

Today, managing your brand means understanding your audience’s worldview, one that is greatly defined by the online neighborhoods and meeting places they choose to visit.  These “vicinities,” whether they are blogs, social networking sites, product comparison sites, or user opinion sites change audience behavior, learning and perceptions.  It’s where your customers/prospects find community, belonging, conversation and self expression.  Harnessing these core elements of audience behavior will give companies the skills to manage their brands successfully.  Marketers must know where people choose to interact and congregate, and what they do and say in order to impact their customers’ experience.  Finally, companies can take even more advantage of these networks by recognizing and tapping into the vicinities of their partners, resellers and affiliates in order to broaden their audience interactions.

0
DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookNews VineRedditLinkedIn

Don’t Fight Your Brand

Denny’s tries night-owl vibe.  Courting rockers, chain seek post-party young adults.

Denny’s Corp. is trying to restake its claim as a nocturnal hot spot for young adults.  The restaurant chain, which conjures images of seniors and families digging into morning pancake platters, has been trying to set a different scene for night owls.  Between the hours of 10pm and 5am, it pipes in rock and country music and it is scheduling after-concert parties for up-and-coming bands.  It has added late-night menu items fashioned by well-known musicians including Rascal Flatts, Good Charlotte and Jewel.

Good Charlotte band members Joel, left, and Benji Madden with the Denny's burritos they created

Good Charlotte band members Joel, left, and Benji Madden with the Denny's burritos they created

Denny’s, based in Spartanburg, S. C., has offered 24-hour restaurant service since its inception in 1953.  But, the chain has suffered in recent years as rival chains such as McDonald’s and Burger King started staying open later and attracting young adults in the process.  Taco Bell, a subsidiary of Yum Brands Inc., two years ago coined the term “fourthmeal” to describe the meal between dinner and breakfast served at many of its stores open until 1am or later.

To stem the loss of customers, Denny’s last year created the “Allnighter” program, which includes adopting emerging musicians and offering a “rockstar” menu for night patrons.  It gives adoptees $1,000 in Denny’s gift cards so they can eat while touring.  Then, Denny’s uses Twitter and MySpace to inform its target market of 18- to 24-year-olds when and where the adopted bands’ after-parties will be held and when new menu items are added.

Excerpted from June 30, 2009 article in WSJ.com, by Julie Jargon

Now, to me, this article is extremely important for every business to take note.  Stop fighting it… your brand isn’t who you think you are.  It’s who the audience thinks you are.  Relax and go with it.

0
DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookNews VineRedditLinkedIn