<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Wendistry, LLC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wendistry.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wendistry.com</link>
	<description>"A CEO's GPS"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:31:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Vanity vs. Blog by Wendi</title>
		<link>http://www.wendistry.com/blogging/vanity-vs-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wendistry.com/?p=1041#comment-478</guid>
		<description>You are quite welcome, Suzanne!  I think the next point for discussing is Community vs. Content... the need for marketers to be focused on when the communities&#039; conversation organically leads vs. the need to &quot;push&quot; company-centered content out on the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are quite welcome, Suzanne!  I think the next point for discussing is Community vs. Content&#8230; the need for marketers to be focused on when the communities&#8217; conversation organically leads vs. the need to &#8220;push&#8221; company-centered content out on the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vanity vs. Blog by Suzanne Vara</title>
		<link>http://www.wendistry.com/blogging/vanity-vs-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne Vara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wendistry.com/?p=1041#comment-461</guid>
		<description>Wendi

You bring up a very good point here - who is listening.  Vanity does kill blogs as the self induced pressure to hit the mark and the traffic counts takes away from looking at who is listening.  We listen to those we trust but how can we trust when there is inconsistency or not really knowing that they are listening?  Our attention is stretched in many areas with social media and traditional networking and being here, there and everywhere is not easy but identify where your audience is and spending time with them does make you the most interested and you have the time to stop and listen.

Thanks for the article mention as well. 

@SuzanneVara</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wendi</p>
<p>You bring up a very good point here &#8211; who is listening.  Vanity does kill blogs as the self induced pressure to hit the mark and the traffic counts takes away from looking at who is listening.  We listen to those we trust but how can we trust when there is inconsistency or not really knowing that they are listening?  Our attention is stretched in many areas with social media and traditional networking and being here, there and everywhere is not easy but identify where your audience is and spending time with them does make you the most interested and you have the time to stop and listen.</p>
<p>Thanks for the article mention as well. </p>
<p>@SuzanneVara</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Marketing Mistakes Bloggers Make, Part 1 by Wendi</title>
		<link>http://www.wendistry.com/blogging/marketing-mistakes-bloggers-make/comment-page-1/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wendistry.com/?p=974#comment-440</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Ross, for the comment!   Another bit of questions/comments I&#039;m getting from people at Brazen Careerists are &quot;how to keep up with blogging?&quot;  I&#039;ve shared that the way I handle this work load is to carve out 5-6 hours on Sunday afternoon and write 5 articles for the week.  Since you can schedule &quot;published&quot; times/dates in Wordpress, that&#039;s exactly what I do.  I&#039;ve also installed Pretty Link Pro which really helps with SEO and it automatically Tweets my post when it&#039;s published.  Hope these additional ideas help!  Please come back later today for Part 2, and thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Ross, for the comment!   Another bit of questions/comments I&#8217;m getting from people at Brazen Careerists are &#8220;how to keep up with blogging?&#8221;  I&#8217;ve shared that the way I handle this work load is to carve out 5-6 hours on Sunday afternoon and write 5 articles for the week.  Since you can schedule &#8220;published&#8221; times/dates in Wordpress, that&#8217;s exactly what I do.  I&#8217;ve also installed Pretty Link Pro which really helps with SEO and it automatically Tweets my post when it&#8217;s published.  Hope these additional ideas help!  Please come back later today for Part 2, and thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Marketing Mistakes Bloggers Make, Part 1 by Ross Simmonds</title>
		<link>http://www.wendistry.com/blogging/marketing-mistakes-bloggers-make/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Simmonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wendistry.com/?p=974#comment-439</guid>
		<description>I took hiatus from blogging a few months back but should be back in the game soon and couldn&#039;t agree with you more on this topic. My first blog had absolutely no strategy and really....no niche what so ever. It was just a complete free for all! One day I was blogging about relationships the next minute I was blogging about music or marketing. It was all over the place. I think that it had a lot to do with the reason I gave it up... I had subscribers and had even developed a community around the blog but I didn&#039;t know what I was doing with it. A strategy is definitely important when it comes to blogging and is often overlooked.

Great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took hiatus from blogging a few months back but should be back in the game soon and couldn&#8217;t agree with you more on this topic. My first blog had absolutely no strategy and really&#8230;.no niche what so ever. It was just a complete free for all! One day I was blogging about relationships the next minute I was blogging about music or marketing. It was all over the place. I think that it had a lot to do with the reason I gave it up&#8230; I had subscribers and had even developed a community around the blog but I didn&#8217;t know what I was doing with it. A strategy is definitely important when it comes to blogging and is often overlooked.</p>
<p>Great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of Marketing in Media Industry by Wendi</title>
		<link>http://www.wendistry.com/marketing/the-future-of-marketing-in-media-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wendistry.com/?p=950#comment-433</guid>
		<description>Hank,  You&#039;re right on!  I, incorrectly, assumed that my language implied mobility... Yes, especially Gen X &amp; Y, consumers are looking for content-on-the-go, and with the invention of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2009/12/square_ipod_payment_system.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Apple&#039;s Square&lt;/a&gt;, there&#039;s no telling how far mobile will go.  Thanks for the comment, Hank!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hank,  You&#8217;re right on!  I, incorrectly, assumed that my language implied mobility&#8230; Yes, especially Gen X &amp; Y, consumers are looking for content-on-the-go, and with the invention of <a href="http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2009/12/square_ipod_payment_system.html" rel="nofollow">Apple&#8217;s Square</a>, there&#8217;s no telling how far mobile will go.  Thanks for the comment, Hank!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of Marketing in Media Industry by Hank Mondaca</title>
		<link>http://www.wendistry.com/marketing/the-future-of-marketing-in-media-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Mondaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wendistry.com/?p=950#comment-430</guid>
		<description>All that great info, be it positive or frightening, and no mention of mobile marketing?  The ability to create predictable sales goals by implementing proven marketing, advertising and promotional programs that actually “capture” the attention of their audience and entices them to take immediate action is very powerful.  

Necessary vehicles to present mobile marketing are print media, outdoor advertising, television &amp; radio as well as digital signage. With the enormous growth of this medium, the hopes will be for the traditional and digital media agencies to prosper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All that great info, be it positive or frightening, and no mention of mobile marketing?  The ability to create predictable sales goals by implementing proven marketing, advertising and promotional programs that actually “capture” the attention of their audience and entices them to take immediate action is very powerful.  </p>
<p>Necessary vehicles to present mobile marketing are print media, outdoor advertising, television &amp; radio as well as digital signage. With the enormous growth of this medium, the hopes will be for the traditional and digital media agencies to prosper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dockers MANifesto by The Return of Chest Hair…Thank Goodness &#171; Polite PR</title>
		<link>http://www.wendistry.com/branding/dockers-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>The Return of Chest Hair…Thank Goodness &#171; Polite PR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wendistry.com/?p=883#comment-429</guid>
		<description>[...] B: Dockers’ new ad campaign touts a return to the MANifesto (I like Wendi R W McGowan’s explanation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] B: Dockers’ new ad campaign touts a return to the MANifesto (I like Wendi R W McGowan’s explanation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 10 Marketing Must Dos by Wendi</title>
		<link>http://www.wendistry.com/branding/marketing-must-dos/comment-page-1/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wendistry.com/?p=873#comment-427</guid>
		<description>Agree, Bill.  &quot;Greenwashing&quot; and other tactics to look more socially responsible purely for marketing&#039;s sake is a sad sham in which no one, especially the customer, is fooled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree, Bill.  &#8220;Greenwashing&#8221; and other tactics to look more socially responsible purely for marketing&#8217;s sake is a sad sham in which no one, especially the customer, is fooled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 10 Marketing Must Dos by Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.wendistry.com/branding/marketing-must-dos/comment-page-1/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wendistry.com/?p=873#comment-426</guid>
		<description>Ah, but with respect to number 8, be cognizant that very bright and reasonable people sometimes disagree on what is indisputably socially responsible.  There are well known and poplular positions on social issues and we are all aware of what positions we can take that will not subject us to criticism.  AKA political correctness.  So attempts at being indisputably socially responsible are likely impossible.  It is possible, however, to appear to be indisputably socially responsible by making sure we are always in concurrence with the popular view, but...I would argue that that is another form of irresponsibility.  Life is a percentage deal.   Try your best and always try to do what is right.  It will be disputed sometimes, however, and that&#039;s just the way it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, but with respect to number 8, be cognizant that very bright and reasonable people sometimes disagree on what is indisputably socially responsible.  There are well known and poplular positions on social issues and we are all aware of what positions we can take that will not subject us to criticism.  AKA political correctness.  So attempts at being indisputably socially responsible are likely impossible.  It is possible, however, to appear to be indisputably socially responsible by making sure we are always in concurrence with the popular view, but&#8230;I would argue that that is another form of irresponsibility.  Life is a percentage deal.   Try your best and always try to do what is right.  It will be disputed sometimes, however, and that&#8217;s just the way it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dockers MANifesto by Scott Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.wendistry.com/branding/dockers-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wendistry.com/?p=883#comment-425</guid>
		<description>I agree strongly with Bill on this. It&#039;s time again for men to be able to be men without the assumption that it means you&#039;re a Neanderthal.

&quot;Real men&quot; have physical and intellectual pursuits and know how to treat a lady while knowing that they don&#039;t have to take [crap] from anyone. BTW, I&#039;m not suggesting that women should take crap from anyone either, but it seems to me that far too many guys cow-tow.

Personally, I like gender roles. Not in the &quot;Leave It to Beaver&quot; sense necessarily, but it&#039;s the differences that create balance. In some ways, this reminds me of the little league teams where every team &quot;wins&quot; (really, is that how life works?).  It&#039;s nonsense.  We feel like we&#039;re pumping kids up and making sure they all have good self esteem, but we&#039;re really setting them up for false expectations and a sense of entitlement that is an illusion.  Some of the best lessons in life I have learned, as a kid and as an entrepreneur, were from my failures.  However painful those have been at times. 

If we assume everyone has to be the same and treated the same, we&#039;re setting ourselves up for disaster and therein lies the problem with an androgynous society.  In order to bring everyone into a &quot;blended&quot; society, we would have to not only find a way to discard (ignore) peoples weaknesses, but we would also have to discard their strengths.  

I&#039;m not saying people should be treated badly (ever,) but don&#039;t confuse everyone having equal opportunity with everyone being equally successful or equal achievement.  We aren&#039;t all equal in every regard, as people, in our gender, or even in our cultures.  And, while I&#039;m at it, we need to stop assuming inequality instantly implies someone is generally inferior.  It doesn&#039;t.  It means we&#039;re different, and that is a good thing.

Back to the ad:  I think it&#039;s simply suggesting that men need to take the reins back on their manhood and be proud of it.  The way women (rightly) have become proud of who they are. 

For what&#039;s it&#039;s worth, I still like an occasional latte and drank a lot of pina colada&#039;s on the beach in Maui last week. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree strongly with Bill on this. It&#8217;s time again for men to be able to be men without the assumption that it means you&#8217;re a Neanderthal.</p>
<p>&#8220;Real men&#8221; have physical and intellectual pursuits and know how to treat a lady while knowing that they don&#8217;t have to take [crap] from anyone. BTW, I&#8217;m not suggesting that women should take crap from anyone either, but it seems to me that far too many guys cow-tow.</p>
<p>Personally, I like gender roles. Not in the &#8220;Leave It to Beaver&#8221; sense necessarily, but it&#8217;s the differences that create balance. In some ways, this reminds me of the little league teams where every team &#8220;wins&#8221; (really, is that how life works?).  It&#8217;s nonsense.  We feel like we&#8217;re pumping kids up and making sure they all have good self esteem, but we&#8217;re really setting them up for false expectations and a sense of entitlement that is an illusion.  Some of the best lessons in life I have learned, as a kid and as an entrepreneur, were from my failures.  However painful those have been at times. </p>
<p>If we assume everyone has to be the same and treated the same, we&#8217;re setting ourselves up for disaster and therein lies the problem with an androgynous society.  In order to bring everyone into a &#8220;blended&#8221; society, we would have to not only find a way to discard (ignore) peoples weaknesses, but we would also have to discard their strengths.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying people should be treated badly (ever,) but don&#8217;t confuse everyone having equal opportunity with everyone being equally successful or equal achievement.  We aren&#8217;t all equal in every regard, as people, in our gender, or even in our cultures.  And, while I&#8217;m at it, we need to stop assuming inequality instantly implies someone is generally inferior.  It doesn&#8217;t.  It means we&#8217;re different, and that is a good thing.</p>
<p>Back to the ad:  I think it&#8217;s simply suggesting that men need to take the reins back on their manhood and be proud of it.  The way women (rightly) have become proud of who they are. </p>
<p>For what&#8217;s it&#8217;s worth, I still like an occasional latte and drank a lot of pina colada&#8217;s on the beach in Maui last week. <img src='http://www.wendistry.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
