The Future of Marketing in Media Industry

Like any other business, the media industry evolves in cycles.  In the past few years, the job openings at media companies have been few and far between, but now, as content converges and more media companies are looking for interesting and engaging ways to branch out and reach larger population bases, there is an increase in the availability of highly coveted marketing positions.  However, the availability of new technologies and new developments in the media industry have created a demand for new kinds of experience, cultural knowledge and skill sets that candidates must be aware of it they wish to vye for such a position.

The media industry, historically, has not provided much in the way of career potential for marketing executives.  Today, though, it is currently exceeding more mature industries, such as consumer packaged goods, in career opportunities.  When searching for a marketing position in the media industry, it’s important to know that the industry itself is highly varied.  There’s online media, traditional print media (newspapers, magazines, trade publications, etc.), television media, music media, etc.  All these forms have different revenue models that require a different forms of marketing.  For example, an e-commerce focused company might be interested in hiring marketing professionals to support customer acquisitions or product development, while a newspaper might need marketing support for circulation.

Newspaper executives know that online classified-advertising services are taking a bite out of industry revenues. Recent announcements by Google and Microsoft suggesting their interest in the classifieds business only add to the newspapers’ concerns, which also include rising costs and declining circulation.

From 2001 to 2004, online players such as craigslist, Monster, and Realtor.com captured approximately 5% of the newspapers’ U.S. market share—resulting in a loss of $2 billion of the $34 billion classifieds market.  In some categories of classifieds, the loss was far greater: 40% or more.  Lost market share is only part of the story.  Newspapers are having difficulty raising advertising rates to make up for sagging volume, since online competitors offer advertisers an inexpensive (and inexhaustible) supply of ad space in local and national markets.  In some cities, newspapers find that they must offer small advertisers general classified ads free of charge.  Newspaper publishers cannot afford to give ground, because classified ads make up more than one-third of their advertising revenues.  display ads account for most of the rest.

Any company that sells similar products at a range of prices fears cannibalization.  Take the case of a subscription media company that expanded from one product line to a mix of offers that included several similar but lower-priced products sold through a number of channels.  Executives felt that the new offers were necessary because the original product, while quite profitable, was losing market share and might never penetrate certain customer segments.  The new products did indeed attract these elusive customers, but the lower prices also lured some established customers away from the mature product.

Deciding how aggressively to push the new offers proved difficult.  The company’s customer-relationship-management system allowed marketers to pinpoint the extent of the cannibalization.  Yet the data implied simplistic recommendations—for instance, abandoning the new products without regard for their strategic importance.  Unless the implications were clarified, product managers balked at exploring the trade-offs between market share and profitability. Indeed, they had an incentive not to do so, for each product was organized as a separate, competing business with its own sales targets.

To break the stalemate, smart senior executives are looking beyond traditional marketing and media buying approaches to data and search engine optimization techniques for planning new marketing expenditures.  Expanding and embracing new forms of marketing that engage and attract younger audiences (to stave off natural attrition rates) are the salvation for traditional print media.  Not to completely replace it… but to make for a more rich and enticing user experience.

1
DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookNews VineRedditLinkedIn

Why You Should Believe in PR

I really don’t believe in PR… by that I mean, I don’t believe in falsely create hype, spin, or bait-and-switch.  However, authentic communication by telling a genuinely relevant story in a compelling manner… that’s something any marketer can stand behind.

If you view every time your company meets with a reporter or sends out a press release to media contacts as an opportunity to talk to your most valued clients, you’ll build a case, tell a story, and hold a reader’s interest.  Being honest about revealing natural enthusiasm for your company is a “soft” approach to selling.  When done right, these are effective tools that condition the marketplace for topics your salesforce has to discuss every day.

Corporate citizenship and cause-related marketing are other opportunities to build authentic communication.  Once your company decides on a theme, introduce it by talking about the results in the community, to your customers and suppliers, with your partners and Board of Directors, rather than hyping it as “breaking news” in a press release.

Through its ability to connect with people and make brands more accessible and relevant, public relations is becoming increasingly more important today.  Media people are the most connected members of social media platforms.  As communicators, marketing must engage both customers and employees intelligently, honestly, and continuously in a manner that everyone can believe in.

0
DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookNews VineRedditLinkedIn

PR Practitioner Picking Process

Last week, I had some decisions to make for a client with regard to PR, the media, and the whole publicity process.  Which got me to thinking… your PR team can help make or break your company’s credentials in the eyes of your potential clients.  So, my advice is to prepare carefully and resist rushing while searching for a public relations partner or any other business service provider.

The search for an agency or consultant isn’t just a shopping trip.  Management must invest staff resources in a search team that will define objectives, research options, evaluate potential partners and manage all the details in between. Much of the team’s work happens before it even starts looking for a firm.

STEP 1:  Clearly articulate business objectives so they can be shared with prospective partners.

The best providers want to understand the over-arching business objectives so that they can tailor suggestions and proposals to meet those objectives.  For example, executives looking to increase revenues by generating more short-term leads will find that bringing someone on to handle news media relations will likely not address that business objective.

STEP 2:  Set communications goals.

It’s tempting to create a to-do list of tactics, but that will fall short of meeting business objectives.  The danger with saying ‘write me a news release’ or ‘do me a brochure’ or ‘do me a press conference’ is that you are not hiring advice or counsel; you are hiring production. Production does not bring as much value to a client as counsel does.  There are appropriate times, places, and events to cover in a variety of media outlets.  Knowing which ones work best on which audiences takes a skilled professional. 

STEP 3:  Prepare a request for qualification (RFQ).

Done right, this can be simpler and more informative than a traditional request for proposal (RFP) for both the client and prospective partner.  When it comes to hiring any professional services partner, an RFQ is a better alternative than an RFP because it can reveal a firm’s experience, qualifications and references. This type of information is more insightful than an unrealistic proposal based on guesses and assumptions.

The RFQ should specify what information your company requires to make a decision; business and communications objectives and measures; description of the situation requiring outside PR advice; the scope of the assignment; and expected budget range.  The RFQ also is the place to request references, capabilities and examples of how the agency has addressed similar situations.

What NOT to do:

  • Make a decision on speculation.  Ask for samples or a writing test instead.
  • Create a formal plan.  It is good to present a scenario that a potential PR firm can react to, but don’t ask for a plan during the search phase. Real plan development requires formal engagement of the decision makers and the best thinking will happen collaborating with your company’s executives.  Besides, the best PR firms place a high value on strategic planning and will not want to give away their process for free.
  • Bank on one recommendation.  Get recommendations from peers, business acquaintances and members of professional associations such as PRSA. Use the Internet for a quick look at an agency’s capabilities and style, as well as what others are saying about it.

In the end, the most critical question your company must answer about a firm or consultant is, “Can we have a positive, productive relationship?”  Successful business leaders consider a PR firm as a business partner, similar to a law firm or accounting firm.

 

0
DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookNews VineRedditLinkedIn

Be a Star Speaker for Presentations and the Media

The power of presence is underrated in our society… but, everyone knows it when they see it.  It may shock you to discover that it takes a person less than 7 seconds to judge whether you are credible, trustworthy, attractive, acceptable, knowledgable, and generally someone they want to have around for 20 more seconds.  

Your speaking and engagement skills are a part of your personal brand, and if you are the CEO, the brand of the company as well.  Learn how to toot your own horn without blowing it

 

0
DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookNews VineRedditLinkedIn

BREAKING NEWS!!!

Reference back to my post last Thursday!

http://boston.bizjournals.com/boston/stories/2008/04/28/story6.html?f=et148&b=1209355200^1625031&ana=e_vert

0
DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookNews VineRedditLinkedIn

PR: In-House or Outsource?

In? Out? Geesh, when it comes to Public Relations and Media Management, most companies (especially start-ups) have to face either hiring full-time in-house personnel or outsourcing the function to a firm. Here are my thoughts on the pros and cons of either scenario:

1. The PROS of an in-house person/staff:
- Lower cost– decent PR firm will run you $10K to $18K monthly
- You retain the knowledge and control of your industry secrets/advantages
- You own the press/analyst relationships more directly
- Your team is able to respond quicker in case of crisis management or breaking news

2. The PROS of a PR firm:
- Compounded network of their access to industry journalists/analysts
- Their client roster/peer as potential network for your company
- Valuable outside sounding board
- Additional source of new ideas

3. The CONS of an in-house person/staff:
- PR is usually just a sub-set of overall marketing responsibilities
- Less frequent correspondence with journalists than a PR firm will have may lead to missed coverage opportunities
- Being too close to subject matter may limit scope of new ideas

4. The CONS of a PR firm:
- Exhorbitant cost
- Typically most of work delivered by junior-level firm staffers
- Time spent keeping your PR firm updated
- They own the journalist/analyst relationships
- Possible conflicts of interest with their other clients
- Weekly/monthly status reports and other posturing and continuing “sales” activities

Whichever option you decide is best for your business, just make sure your PR professional keeps track of published articles, editorials, press announcements, TV appearances, all coverage your company garners each month. Your person should list these items attached to the monthly invoice along with the time spend making call to try and get speaking engagements and the community relations work performed so that you, as the business owner, can see how much time and relationship building goes into the whole PR and media process.

I figure when my clients see how all these activities add up, they can choose either to handle it themselves in-house (plus run their business which already keeps them overwhelmed), or let me do what I feel I do best.

0
DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookNews VineRedditLinkedIn

PR can equal unPRetty

Chris Anderson, the editor-in-chief of Wired Magazine and author of “The Long Tail,” ignited an online PR firestorm recently by posting a list on his blog of 300 PR people who had sent him unsolicited and unwanted PR pitches, saying that he had unilaterally and permanently added them to his blocked senders list.

I don’t approve of Anderson’s action — I’m sure he has better things to do than complain about PR. But his post does blow the cover off one of PR’s not so pretty secrets: selling PR to internal and external clients on the basis of quantity, not quality. Justifying your budget and importance by saying “we pitched the story to 200 reporters” has been exposed as a fraud, if your target list includes journalists like Anderson who are going to hit delete the second they see your pitch (or worse, simply block you from even reaching their inbox). You’ll have more long-term media relations success if you pitch quality — targeting the right journalists, building relationships, only sending them newsworthy stuff — over quantity.

Try a new approach… pitching to bloggers. they’re not mainstream media. Among the differences is that they have unlimited space to say whatever they want, including using their blog to blast PR people. Mainstream journalists are probably just as fed up with getting spam pitches as Anderson, but they aren’t going to waste precious ink or air time complaining about it.
Bloggers are the ultimate niche media. Every one of them has their own unique point of view and audience. It’s a waste of time and resources to send them blast email pitches. Scratch that strategy off your list. Instead, if you really want to reach a blogger’s audience, read their blog thoroughly, leave comments on their site, and then pitch them something customized for them alone.

0
DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookNews VineRedditLinkedIn

How NOT to Launch a New Product (or Business for that matter)

You’ve built the better mousetrap, now you’re expecting the proverbial path-beating to your door. Here are some classic mistakes companies make while getting ready to launch.

1. Don’t plan the launch until right before the release date– Nothing is more disheartening to a PR or marketing consultant than to have a client call and say, “We have a great new product ready to launch next month. Can you develop a plan by next week?”

2. Carve your launch plan in stone– Few new product introductions go exactly according to plan. Manufacturing snafus occur. Distribution gets delayed. Be sure to build flexibility into your launch plan. Always ask the unpopular question, “What if the launch date gets delayed?”

3. Put the head honcho in charge of the launch– Brand managers or product managers are best suited to take primary responsibility for the launch process—not senior personnel whose multiple and competing duties can impair focus and tactical expertise. The involvement and support of the CEO, president and other senior leaders are critical to the success of a launch, but not on a daily basis.

4. Don’t educate employees until after the news breaks elsewhere– Your employees are your most important word-of-mouth brand ambassadors. Educate them about the launch plan and prepare them to talk about the product with their family and friends so they can begin to build the buzz.

5. Use the same forms of media you’ve always used– The number of potential media outlets that can talk about your new product grows daily. Don’t just dig out the same media list you used for your last launch. There are 6,200 magazines and 240 television stations available today, with hundreds more being introduced each year. Don’t overlook Internet media outlets that might not have existed when you executed previous launches.

6. Skip the crisis plan– The number of things that can go wrong when a new product hits the market is limitless. Brainstorm all potential pitfalls to ensure your plan provides remedies for what might go wrong. It’s always better to have a crisis plan in place rather than trying to create one while facing a major issue that could tarnish your brand.

0
DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookNews VineRedditLinkedIn

The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth

or… What is your return on “marketing integrity?”

A Yankelovich study a few years ago found that as many as two-thirds of Americans believe that businesses would take advantage of the public if those businesses did not think they would be exposed. As many as one-fourth of Americans agreed that there is literally nothing that business can do to recapture their trust once it is lost. (“State of Consumer Trust,” 2004).

Most marketers may be honest in the sense that they do not blatantly lie or intend to mislead, but the definition of “honest” is shifting to a higher realm since customer loyalty (and trust comes before loyalty) is at a premium. Traditional Return On Marketing Investment is calculated using Gross Margin generated by marketing efforts (GM), minus the Marketing Investment (I), divided by that investment: ROMI = (GM – I) ÷ I. The calculation for return on marketing integrity is identical, except that investment is replaced with marketing integrity.

Simple enough to explain, considerably more difficult to measure. An example would be a company investing significant man hours and dollar expenditures ensuring that every marketing claim is ruthlessly checked with R&D for accuracy, then any attitudinal or behavioral gains among customers can be at least partially credited to those investments.

Now, why would a business make these extra efforts? Yes, everyone wants more customers, but is it really worth the time and effort? Yes, for several reasons:

1. Measuring the impact of integrity can help marketers learn some of the reasons why customers are buying in the first place… revealing why they remain loyal will lead to increased profitability.

2. Tracking integrity may uncover new ways to attract more new customers… discovering what your company’s unique value proposition is (in your customer’s eyes).

3. By regularly comparing integrity performance and financial bottom-line impact, businesses may be able to significantly reduce the unforced integrity erros that have cost other companies brand equity and sales declines… i.e. was “New Coke” really new?

4. Maintaining a sense of marketing integrity can protect brand image when a company is under scrutiny… ex: Enron; ’nuff said.

During a credibility crisis involving the troubled General Re acquisition, Warren Buffet once observed, “Berkshire can afford to lose money, even lots of money; it can’t afford to lose…even a shred of reputation.” If the Oracle of Omaha can’t afford it, neither can the rest of us.

0
DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookNews VineRedditLinkedIn

Just Own Up…

This week the condos where I live had a major catastrophe. A disgruntled resident was first assaulted by a property manager, then evicted 24 hours later. The resident immediately set up a blog, has advertised the URL to everyone on property, and has hired an attorney. To say “chaos-of-he-said-she-said” and potential media frenzy is an understatement.

However, this situation got me thinking about Crisis Management for companies and the fact that survival often hinges on what you do and say in the first few hours. What the news media report in their first stories — and how they view your coping skills — will often set the tone for the entire crisis. Chances are, the media’s first impression will persist until you have overcome the problem and emerged victorious … or you’ve been humiliated, fired, put out of business, arrested, sued, divorced … the list goes on and on.

Of course, planning for crises is something we avoid. It is like buying life insurance or long-term disability insurance. Most people don’t do it because they don’t want to think about the possibility of their own death or disability. We have been forced by law and mortgage lenders to get accustomed to buying accident insurance for our cars, homeowners insurance for our houses. But we still try to avoid contemplating those greater disasters that can lead to the destruction of our businesses — the careers, productivity and morale of the people who work there.

Most companies have written plans for fires, storms, floods. They practice those plans frequently. Should a fire or storm or flood occur, everyone will know — without thinking — what needs to be done and how to do it. Yet, very few organizations have media crisis plans. And those that do rarely rehearse them.

The truth is most of you reading this will have a media crisis long before you have a fire or tornado or flood. And media crises in a media-driven society can be much more damaging, much more demoralizing than those hazards of nature. If and when the media discover the crisis, your skill in influencing how they report it — or decide not to report it — are key factors that determine the outcome.

The tone of the early stories usually hinges on how well reporters and editors know you, your understanding of media strategy, your experience and reflexes in dealing with journalists.
One of the most difficult steps in crisis management is making the decision that there actually is a crisis. (An annoyed customer setting up a blog MIGHT be a clue?!?) Wait too late, and you may not be able to save the sinking ship.

0
DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookNews VineRedditLinkedIn